A Proposal for the Nevada County Board of Supervisors and Public Health.

Posted by on Oct 29, 2021 in COVID-19, Dave's Blog | 8 comments
Tags: , , , , , ,

Summary

Whereas: 

  1. The COVID-19 injections, rather than providing the much-anticipated herd immunity, are increasing the number of cases and deaths in spite of short term (3-4 months) individual reduction in case count and symptom severity. (Vaccines like the polio vaccine actually prevent the spread of pathogens. Before September 2021, a “vaccine” produced immunity to a specific disease. After September, 2021, according to the CDC, a vaccine merely provides protection. The COVID-19 injections do not meet the historical definition of a vaccine. Vaccine has just morphed from immunity to protection.)
  2. Medical kits (COVID kits) have been proven to be the most effective way to stop the pandemic.
  3. In Nevada County and throughout much of the United States, people are not receiving adequate informed consent prior to getting an injection for COVID-19. 
  4. When therapeutic nihilistic medical practices as described by Dr Peter McCullough, fail to provide early treatment, rates of hospitalizations and deaths remain elevated.
  5. Electromagnetic frequencies such as are found in cell phone towers, facilitate the spread of all viruses, including SARS-cov-2 and have other harmful effects on the environment.

Board of Supervisors:

  1. Declares Nevada County to be a COVID-19 injection mandate free zone, including for children.

2. Applies the precautionary principle to deny any further construction of cell phone towers

Public Health:

1. Assign existing COVID-19 relief funds to finance medical kits for any county resident and their family members who choose to use them at the first sign of illness.

2. Monitor progress and advise hospitalization if needed. 

3. Ensures that all “vaccination” sites provide adequate unbiased informed consent as described in this document.

Justification for the proposal:

  1. Failure to treat early

Whereas:

In spite of media reports to the contrary, without justification, the FDA does not have the legal or moral authority to restrict off label use of drugs such as ivermectin.

The nihilistic approach of many doctors led to failure to provide early lifesaving treatment of COVID-19. The “COVID or vaccine” dichotomy, according to many physicians, was simply a way for the FDA to promote Emergency Use Authorization vaccines regardless of the human cost.  The original myth promulgated by the CDC and FDA that there is no treatment for viruses and that patients should isolate and stay at home until symptoms become severe has contributed to thousands of deaths in the United States. Yet top down directives from the CDC and FDA have directed healthcare providers to practice this alleged “standard of care.” The FDA, CDC and associated federal and state agencies are captured by the pharmaceutical Industry and are therefore, in spite of their public pronouncements to the contrary, more focused on protecting the vaccine project than the health of the public.  Proof for this can be found in India where health officials in areas far from the influence of the FDA have achieved dramatic reductions in cases and deaths.

Government authorities in Uttar Pradesh, a province in India with a population of 204 million,  recorded a seven day average of COVID-19 cases of 34,813 on April 27, 2021 before they implemented their home medical kit program on May 11, 2021. The kits were given to patients and their families. They were part of an aggressive public health intervention that involved case tracking, aggressive followup, and close management of the infected, 10% of whom were hospitalized. Within days, the rate of infections plummeted. By October 20, the seven-day average of new cases was 9 patients. In India the kits cost less that 13 dollars.

In contrast, Tamil Nadu, a province of 67 million, tried to start a similar program but were prevented from doing so by WHO executive scientist, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan. Case numbers and deaths remained high. As of Oct 20, they had a 7-day average of 1200 new patients. On 6 September, 2021 The Indian BAR Association announced they were charging Dr. Swaminathan with murder due to the increases in cases and deaths following cessation of the medical kit program.  “Acting for the Indian Bar Association, Dipali Ojha said the WHO official is accused of misconduct because she used her position as a public health official to further the agenda of special interests to maintain an Emergency Use Authorization for the lucrative vaccine industry.“

In spite of “fact checkers” claiming “vaccines” are responsible for the differences,  the current injection rate in both provinces is roughly equivalent to 18%.

CDC Director Walensky confirmed in August 2021, that the shots do not prevent infection or transmission. This fact alone undercuts any rationale for shot mandates. Both the “vaccinated” and the “unvaccinated” spread the infection. Because of the injections, the “vaccinated” may be less aware of their symptoms. For the President to declare that giving the “unvaccinated” the “freedom to kill” is not only irrational. It is discriminatory. As many experts have stated, these injections will never lead to herd immunity. They are in fact worsening the epidemic as can be seen in the above chart. Go here for another example. Given Dr Walensky’s statement it is also nonsensical to require, let alone mandate any injections. Natural immunity in recovered patients provides a better layer of protection that being fully vaccinated.

In a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak among 42 patients in a hospital setting, 39 were fully vaccinated,” including the source. The vaccination rate was 96%. Among the exposed, inpatients comprised 23% of the infections and staff 10%. All transmission between patients and staff occurred between masked and vaccinated individuals.

Quoting from an ongoing lawsuit against the CDC, by a physician who recovered from COVID-19 and is refusing to take the mandatory jab:

“The naturally immune have sterilizing immunity, a negligible rate of reinfection, and no documented cases of subsequent transmission exist for this population. The vaccine immune, in contrast, do not have sterilizing, are frequent asymptomatic carriers, have a high breakthrough rate, and have many documented cases of subsequent transmission after breakthrough. It is simply irrational, illogical, authoritarian, and punitive to apply limitations to the naturally immune that do not apply to the vaccinated.” In other words, if the CDC lifts restrictions on the vaccinated, it is authoritarian and prejudicial to not lift these same restrictions on the naturally immune.

2. Violations of the Nuremburg Code

Whereas current COVID-19 practices are in violation of the Nuremberg Code:

For those who say the vaccines are approved, one could argue that the current EUA is based on a flawed process where the usual requirements for a safety committee were not in place, the termination of the control group was far too premature, and where long term effects could not possibly be known. As one FDA official said to the effect, “We have to approve it for children, then we can assess for safety.” One could also make a case for fraud, given that vaccine effectiveness declines every month. The fact remains that none of the COVID-19 injections being used have been approved and licensed. They are still experimental in nature.Therefore, the Nuremberg code applies.This Code stipulates the following for experimental research subjects.

– The person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

– The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

– The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

– The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

– No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

– The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. 

People are not being given fully informed consent on what are still experimental novel mRNA altering drugs. Firing an employee for not taking an experimental injection and bribing them are violations of the code. Any official or agency ignoring the Nuremberg Code is in violation of international law.

3 Paradoxical unexpected consequences of COVID-19 injections

Whereas the vaccines will never provide herd immunity:

– Exacerbation of the pandemic. While the injections have been proven effective in reducing severity of symptoms, hospitalization and deaths, before their effectiveness wanes,  (3-6 months) paradoxically there is an inverse relationship  between percent vaccinated and increased patient counts and deaths. Some of the most vaccinated countries have the highest rates of new cases and deaths. This relationship is found in countries and counties. The causes of this inverse relationship are not fully understood though there are several attractive hypotheses.

– Waning of efficacy. In Israel this has led to mandatory boosters, and presumably a lifetime of boosters, notwithstanding the evidence that Ivermectin is an effective prophylactic

– The imperfect “vaccine” hypothesis. A vaccine developed for Marek’s disease vaccine essentially “taught” the virus how to mutate into a more formidable virus. The new virus killed all unvaccinated chickens. The vaccine was a non sterilizing leaky vaccine, that is, one like the COVID-19 “vaccines” that reduce symptoms but do not stop the spread. Based on this, one could argue that Marek’s is now a disease of the unvaccinated caused by the vaccinated.

– Promotion of variants. Contrary to “trusted news initiative” sources such as Google with its biased selection algorithms, Poynter, Politifact, and Forbes, not only do the injections fail to stop viral spread, they also provide the primary driver for the evolution of variants. It is the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated who are supporting the evolution of variants. An Israeli study demonstrated that the prevalence rate of the South African variant was eight times higher for those receiving one or two of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines than for those who had not been vaccinated

-Increasing community viral load. Before vaccines, anyone who was infected was symptomatic. They didn’t feel like going out. Now, the vaccinated may continue to work, and spread the infection to others even while infected because they either have no symptoms, or have such minor symptoms to be indistinguishable from a common cold. On the Hidden Gateway Podcast with Lesston Williams, mRNA vaccine inventor Robert Malone stated that the vaccinated “are the real super spreaders.” Both the vaccinated and unvaccinated can infect others.

Antibody dependent enhancement. This is a condition in which antibodies from vaccines bind with the virus, but instead of killing it, transport it into the body. The antibodies enhance virus entry and replication in cells. This causes a more severe infection in a vaccinated person than would otherwise be the case.

Proliferation of electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) including 5 G call phone towers.  EMF does not cause COVID-19, or the flu, but it does facilitate viral spread. Dr Magda Havas and others have demonstrated strong correlations between 5G deployment and extent of COVID-19. For example Wuhan China, before the pandemic, completed a city wide deployment of 5G.  While such a statement may appear ludicrous to the lay public, closer scrutiny of the research demonstrates that at the cellular level, EMF opens these calcium channels. Viral infections open these channels during the infection process. Calcium channel blockers have been proven to restrict viral entry. Researchers have demonstrated that elderly COVID-19 patients who happened to be on calcium channel blockers had significantly fewer hospital days and lower mortality than those not taking the channel blockers. 

Therefore:

Board of  Supervisors:

– Provides leadership in the county to challenge the false narratives being promulgated by the various institutional advocates for the “trusted News Initiative.”

Declares Nevada County to be a COVID-19 injection mandate free zone for adults and children.

-In accordance with the precautionary principle, declares an immediate halt to 5G tower construction.

-Provides funds for a small study to determine if correlations exist between COVID-19 cases and proximity to 5 G cell phone towers.

Advises employers, including County officials, that there is no law requiring mandates, that a President cannot make law during a press conference, and that requiring the vaccines as a condition of employment is a violation of international law.

Public Health:

– Prepares, in consultation with officials from Uttar Pradesh, FLCCC, and the Bird group the latest updates on the most effective products and dosages for effective early treatment home medical kits. Some of the contents, subject to medical review, may include vitamins C, D3, and B, zinc, ivermectin, doxycycline, aspirin and pulse oximeters.

 – Assigns Reach Team Members to prepare and distribute these kits to willing individuals and their family members upon first indication of infection along with written and verbal instructions on how to use them. Patients will not be told to wait until they are sick enough to need to come to the hospital. Early treatment has already been proven to prevent hospitalizations and deaths.

-Utilize MAA funding for this project.

– Require fully informed unbiased consent for anyone wanting to get a COVID-19 injection or booster shot to include:

 -Latest VAERS data

 -Summaries of arguments for and against the “vaccines” by health professionals who have no conflict of interest. This must include a summary of arguments presented during the eight hour meeting of the Vaccine and related biological products advisory committee held 17 September which resulted in a 16 to 2 decision against the boosters and the October 20 Question and Answer session with the FDA explaining the rationale to approve the boosters. These summaries should also include information on adverse effects, illnesses and deaths. For example, one person at that meeting claimed that the “vaccines” will kill more children than they will save. Among children ages 12 to 17 there have already been 18 injection related deaths and 432 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis.

-The death and adverse events reports, according to whistleblowers and data from Medicare records, claim five to ten times more adverse events than reported in VAERS. Anaphylactic reactions alone, in an actual 50,000 person cohort, were 40 times higher than reported by VAERS.

-Finally, the informed consent must include data on the effectiveness of early interventions for prevention and treatment. Government statistics imply that the only option is “vaccinate” or get COVID, or, in the extreme, “vaccinate” or die. There are multiple effective ways to prevent illness and restore people to health.

-Educate the public on the preventive nutritional practices and the need for early intervention.

The editor of the British Medical Journal once wrote, “When good science is suppressed people die.” These early intervention recommendations are based on good science. If implemented, they will save lives and reduce suffering.

8 Comments

  1. Very well documented and organized with well focused headings for a quick overview and in depth clear read. I’m going to forward this to friends in Santa Cruz, Sacramento and Tennessee who might be in contact with others who would like to make a similar presentation to their governing bodies using your information. This proposal can motivate others to bring a healthy, productive, rather than divisive, isolating outlook based on unfounded science and fear.

    • Thanks Paula. We can always hope.

  2. Dave,

    Wishing you great success with the board.

    I would offer to things for your consideration. Are you aware the HHS has codified much of the lessons of Nuremberg and other medical atrocities in 45 CFR 46? The HHS must approve all human experiments.

    Are you aware of a group of Amish who just got covid and a year and a half later are doing just fine? https://youtu.be/O1DgWYdukZU

    • Interesting. So are you saying that HHS hasn’t followed their own 45 CFR 46? Wasn’t aware of the Amish story, but I am not surprised. Almost all my family has had it. They all took ivermectin and other FLCCC recommended products and are doing fine now. I am not optimistic about the board, but sooner or later folks will start to realize that the vaccines are making the problem worse, irrespective of the deaths, hospitalization and disabilities they directly cause. The child vaccines are especially problematic. A number of experts have said they will kill more children than they will save.

  3. While this is a well written document, I am not sure how you expect the Board of Supervisors to respond. They dot no take a vote on letters that are submitted to them. If there is a interest in a topic they may direct staff to prepare a report and schedule a public hearing when there is some type of resolution or ordinance involved and then take a vote. At least in my experience the board will not ever take a vote without following all of the procedures.

    • I sent an early draft to Jill Blake, Dr Kellerman, and Sue Hoek and asked them if there is a way this could get a hearing. Asked Sue if there is a better way to address this issue.

  4. They will hear you but not listen.

    The only solution is removal from office, or removal of the government entirely for its abject failure to properly carry out the offices the people prescribed for themselves.

    There is a great need for a clean sweep.

  5. Excellent letter. The BOS cannot state they didn’t know after this letter.That makes them accomplishes to this dangerous unconstitutional fraud.They can be charged and held accountable.The BOS might want to take that into account. I agree voting them out maybe tge only way unless of course they get a conscience and grow a pair.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.