Dr Fauci Letter#2

Dr Fauci,

As you prepare to graduate from public service it is only fitting to take this opportunity to assess your performance as the highest paid official in the US government in managing the COVID-19 crisis. Some of your highly influential proclamations are listed below, subjected to the scrutiny of evidenced-based medicine.

1. The COVID vaccines are safe and effective.  They will protect you from getting COVID-19, but if you do get sick, they will minimize symptoms. COVID-19 is a disease of the unvaccinated.(false)

Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a highly respected British cardiologist and practitioner of evidence-based medicine initially promoted the COVID vaccines. He advised Indian film director Gurinder Chadra to get the shot on the British TV show “Good Morning Britain.” But then his own father, also a physician, who had been in good health, died six months after getting the Pfizer shot. His physician father had blockages in two major arteries that had been clear before the shots.  (Some researchers suggest there is a 5-month average delay time when massive clots do appear after getting the COVID vaccines.)  Dr. Malhotra began to question whether the jabs were as safe and effective as advertised.

As he told the Epoch Times, “There is more than enough evidence—I would say the evidence is overwhelming—to pause the rollout of the vaccine.” His paper, “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine (Part 1 and Part 2) is now online. At a press conference on 27 September, he presented  his paper in the context of endemic longstanding corruption in the medical industrial complex. He discussed the 1 in 800 to 1000 serious adverse effects from the mRNA vaccines which is higher than the hospitalization rate for COVID-19. He discussed other effects such as lowered sperm count, hormonal dysregulation, autoimmune responses, increases in all-cause mortality and increases in rates and severity of cancers. The latter was from reduced immune function promoting not only cancers, but also reemergence of viruses such as shingles . Dr Tess Laurie also spoke at that press conference.

After the advent of the COVID-19 shots, embalmers have noted the existence of heretofore nonexistent large blood clots in the bodies they prepare for burial.  Steve Kirchner, founder of Vaccine Safety Research Foundation  interviewed Anna Foster, an embalmer from Carrollton Missouri about this phenomenon. She said that 28 out of 30 embalming cases had large blood clots that she had never seen before. These large clots only started appearing in mid-2021 when widespread vaccinations were occurring.

This is not an isolated finding only found among embalmers. The number of unexpected deaths in England climbed 16% in July 2022. The media has discussed this new phenomenon of sudden unexpected deaths, but not vaccine-mediated sudden unexpected deaths. However, when news programs do discuss subject, members of the public frequently make comments linking the vaccines with the deaths or their own loved ones and friends.

This is a subject the censored media won’t touch. To even think that our government, our scientists, our health care providers, even you are responsible for the deaths of thousands is too horrifying to contemplate.

2. The more the population is immunized, the less likely will the pandemic spread. (false)

So, you believe that high immunization rates could help prevent new variants of the virus by slowing its spread. This would presumably limit the evolution of the virus and lead us towards universal protection. So then,  why is there is an increase in COVID infection risk associated with the second jab? Virologist Dr Geert Van Bossch says that mutations are increasing because of the COVID-jabs. He calls for  a halt to the vaccination program because they encourage escape mutate variants.

3. Paxlovid is the preferred treatment for COVID-19 and rebounds are very rare. Horse deworming drugs should not be used. (false)

You continue to advocate for treating COVID-19 with Paxlovid.  As you know, Paxlovid  is a protease inhibitor as is Ivermectin. Both inhibit the enzymes responsible for breaking the virus into small enough pieces so it can replicate.

 A review in the American Journal of Therapeutics included a meta-analysis of 15 trials concluding as follows: “Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using Ivermectin. Using Ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that Ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally. In a randomized trial of a five-day course of Ivermectin the Ivermectin treated group, compared to placebo cleared the virus in in 9.7 days compared to 12.7 days for the placebo group. (p = 0.02) Ivermectin costs pennies compared to the $700 cost for a course of treatment with Paxlovid.

Paxlovid is not only a poor substitute for repurposed drugs like Ivermectin. It. Also, it risks stimulating new viral mutations thereby prolonging the infection. Hence the so-called rebounds.

Now that you, President Biden and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourda have all received COVID-19 shots which failed to protect you from COVID-19 and took Paxlovid for COVID-19 which failed to prevent a rebound infection,  maybe now you can acknowledge that the shots do not prevent COVID-19 and that the “rebound” is not as rare as we have been led to believe.

Paxlovid only binds with the spike protein. Ivermectin binds with the spike protein, the ace 2 receptor and at least 5 other proteins. (e.g., glycoproteins, Nsp14 and PLpro.) In contrast to Paxlovid, Ivermectin prevents viral replication by blocking many parts of the virus. So, the likelihood of Ivermectin promoting variants is much more remote. Instead of one simple evolution of the spike to promote a variant, many more parts of the virus would all have to evolve together.

4. Vaccine-mediated immunity is more effective that natural immunity. (false)

The conclusion of an August 24 2021 article in the Med Rxiv of the BMJ is that “natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. Vaccinated subjects had a 13-fold increased risk of infection compared to unvaccinated subjects. Both groups had never had COVID-19 before the study. Some recovered patients who later got infected and then took the shots benefitted.

Dr Zelenko was a pioneer who saved thousands of COVID-19 patients, in spite of the best efforts by you and the rest of the medical industrial complex to stop him by restricting access to lifesaving drugs he was using. May I suggest you watch this video of Dr Zelenko in which he addresses Jewish leaders in the community.

5. Gain-of-function studies provide an effective way to anticipate and treat present and future pandemics, even if they create short term problems. (false)

In 2012, Drs. Fauci and Collins wrote that gain of function studies were “worth the risk.”  They wrote, “Despite these uncertainties, much good can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory.” How has that one been working for you and the rest of the world?

Your funding of gain-of-function studies very likely contributed to the technology responsible for the creation of the COVID-19. Your proclamations since the outbreak have created and continue to create a perfect storm. Read the scientific papers written by virologists who are saying that the more you vaccinate, the more variants, cases, hospitalizations, and deaths you get. COVID-19 is not the disease of the unvaccinated. Extensive unacknowledged malpractice by physicians who failed to provide early treatment with repurposed drugs increased hospitalizations and deaths.  Just because you say you represent science and have a cadre of well-paid academics and scientists backing you does not mean you are telling the truth. It is time to put the “I am the science” delusion to bed.  The public no longer trusts your pronouncements. The American public may not know it now but they will eventually award you a failing grade for your performance.

Power not utility, determines what happens in social systems such as the NIH, NAID, CDC, media and FDA. All of you have had that power for far too long. You ignore, censor, intimidate those who are seeing the truth. You remove their hospital privileges and remove their medical licenses. While the status quo is utilitarian for the corporate elites it is decidedly nonutilitarian for the average citizen.

Unfortunately, these facts do not matter now because the above agencies have the power and control. They will only matter when your power and the power of these bought agencies is removed, not by incremental improvements, but by a wholesale repudiation of the corrupting influences of corporate money. I do not know how or when that will happen but it must. Maybe a good place to start is to separate the drug companies from the FDA and, like other countries, prohibit drug companies from advertising prescription drugs in mass media. New Zealand and the US are the only two countries that allow that.

Only when the level of public outrage against the national and international corporate elites is sufficient to promote widespread prosecution for a litany of crimes against the people, not the least of which is funding gain-of- function research, can we hope to have a government of, for, and by the people. By the way, a new book written by five anonymous authors is called Turtles all the way down. The authors are anonymous to protect their reputations, their livelihoods, and possible their lives since there have been threats on professionals who are independently researching the facts. Read it.

You, the readers are free to cast your vote in the comments section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.