Terrorism Trilogy Part 1: Who are the Terrorists?

On 7 February, 2022, the Department of Homeland Security Bulletin answered this question.  Alex Berenson, Bobby Kennedy Jr, Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Robert Malone, Dr Joseph Mercola, and thousands of others including myself who challenge the prevailing COVID-19 narrative, are terrorists. In his  9 February 2022 post on Substack entitled “Join me. Become a Terrorist Threat,” Berenson reports on the development of this “ominous threat” with his tongue in his check. Guess he didn’t get the memo on what is happening in Canada now.

The bulletin points out that threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence. [emphasis added]

Speech does not have to encourage rebellion. It just has to inspire violence. Terrorism includes “widespread online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.

But I have news for Alex. He is not the terrorist. The “terrorists” are the individuals who inhabit the medical industrial complex. The US government, global institutions and affiliated agencies and the people in them are the ones that have undermined public trust in government institutions.

The pot is calling the kettle black.

While some government officials might view this post as dangerously misleading, and thus a manifestation of terrorism, is it not true that these same officials have been promoting the development of an’” infectious replication -defective corona virus” by funding gain of function studies over a 20 year period? This resulted in progressively more infectious and dangerous corona viruses, an example of which is the pathogenic S-1 protein spikes injected into the arms of the population.  In 2015 Ralph Baric and others authored an article in Nature entitled  “SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence.” Isn’t that just great? And all they had to do to get them to emerge was to merge them. The article details how Baric and his team created a chimeric virus, that is, a new virus consisting of two different species. He demonstrated the “replication of the chimeric virus in mouse lung with notable pathogenesis.” Hmm, so the virus destroyed the lungs of the mice which were actually lungs genetically modified to contain human genes. Now why would they do that unless to find better ways to kill or disable human beings? In the first online version of the article, the authors failed to acknowledge a funding source, USAID funding from EcoHealth Alliance. The article has a more recent disclaimer to assure the reader this research had nothing to do with COVID-19. While the virus was not SARS-CoV2, the virus believed to cause COVID-19, the paper clearly shows the collaborative relationship between NIAID , the Wuhan lab, and of course the Chinese military that oversaw the lab. This accomplishment occurred after President Obama put a hold on funding for this type of research in 2014.

This sounds about as conspiratorial as the hypothesis offered by, among others, Senator Cotton, when he said he thought the virus leaked from a lab. Early in the pandemic Cotton proposed this and the press uniformly criticized him for being conspiratorial. Now, most believe that he was right. And, Dr David Martin has all the receipts.

In a lengthy interview Dr Martin chronicles a complex history of illegal activities by government agencies pertaining to the development of COVID-19 and other biowarfare products dating back as far as the April 19 2002 when the S-1 protein was patented. He points out that the so-called novel SARS-CoV 2 is merely one of several iterations of the virus produced by gain of function studies and patented by government agencies. He lists a number of corporations and academic institutions that have facilitated what is mistakenly called a novel virus. A 2012 paper written by Fauchi highlighted the benefits of gain of function studies which he funded, in spite of the possibility of a pandemic. Since 1990, he and his network obtained patents on parts of the viruses such as the spike protein, furin-cleavage site,  lung effects on humanized mice). This resulted successively more infectious and lethal viruses.  

On April19, 2002, before the first SARS outbreak in Asia, Ralph Baric and others filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a way to produce recombinant coronavirus. The NIH supported this work. In other words, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.

And Dr Fauchi announced with a straight face in a congressional hearing, that “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Dr Martin revealed 75 letters addressing the funding of various academic research centers to build an “infectious replicative defective corona virus” capable of infecting human lung tissue.  He lists companies and academic institutions that contributed to the weaponization of corona virus.  These include companies most of us have never heard of such as Anser, the Warp Speed firm that sublet contracts to Pfizer, Moderna and Merck. Universities such as Chapel Hill North Carolina, University of California got contracts along with Pfizer, Pfizer and Merck. For a more comprehensive and detailed list of misinformation “terrorists” go to this post in Steve Kirsch’s Newsletter. 

The goals of the Fauchi cabal are clearly spelled out in a talk given by Peter Daszak, the President of Eco Health Alliance given at the New York Academy of Medicine on February 23, 2016. The topic: “Describing the creation of chimeric coronavirus.” “Some of these viruses will be killers, some not. When you get to a sequence of the virus and it looks like a relative of the known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS…we sequenced the spike protein, the protein that attaches to cells. Then we, well, I didn’t do this work but my colleagues in China did the work, you create pseudoparticles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses and see if it binds to human cells.  Each step of the way you move closer and closer to this virus that could really become pathogenic in people. ….You reduce cost and end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.”

This research is and was illegal. It is a violation of federal and International laws prohibiting biowarfare research. According to 18 USC 175, (b), “Whoever knowingly possesses any biological agent, … in a quantity that, under the circumstances, is not reasonably justified by a prophylactic, protective, bona fide research or other peaceful purposes, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years or both. “ This applies if the biological agent has been cultivated, collected, or otherwise extracted from its natural source. Some could argue that “bona fide” research gives the “gain of function” (GOF) proponents a pass.

GOF studies, when they lead to the deaths of millions, are not research, but terrorism. According to Andrew Huff, in an interview with Dr Rober Malone, the argument that GOF could identify threats so scientists could mitigate them is erroneous. For example, the furin cleavage site would never have evolved on its own. Scientists manipulated this as nature never would have. Does GOF research surveil potential natural threats or is it a loophole for bioweapons research. The dark money flowing from DARPA suggests the latter.

What has been the result of this criminal enterprise? The terrorists knowingly or unknowingly created and patented bioweapons that escaped into the world causing massive suffering and the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives.  They promoted vaccine passports. They imposed a medical apartheid upon a fearful public. They took away freedoms that have evolved in western civilization for centuries. They introduced repressive measures used in China such as a modified social credit system. They supported the goals of the World Economic Forum encapsulated under the title “The Great Reset.”

One of the things terrorists do is kill people. The Medical Industrial Complex didn’t put folks in front of firing squads, but they killed people, a lot of people. Visit here to learn of strange findings with embalmers and here to see if the rates of non covid deaths increased since the COVID jabs began. Here is a tease. “Vermont had 71% of their entire population vaccinated by June 1, 2021. That’s 83% of their adult population, yet they are seeing the most excess deaths now since the pandemic!” Is the above misinformation? In a democratic society we find out by data and dialogue, something our government overlords don’t want us doing.    

And now the citizenry is increasingly becoming alarmed and motivated to redress these grievances. More in part 2…..